QUESTION: ARE THERE WAYS TO

VOID UNCONSTITUTIONAL

TREATIES THAT ARE SELLING US

OUT?

ANSWER: YOU BET THERE IS!

ONE ANSWER IS:

REBUS SIC STANTIBUS.

Although it is not commonly known, there is a principle in International Law that the Congress can use to void treaties! What has to happen is that the people must first create a demand for public officials to initiate action to cause the United Nations Charter, the matrix of the problem, to be declared void. The United States membership in that organization will then cease to be obligatory; thus, the United States would no longer be a member of the United Nations.

This principle is known as Rebus Sic Stantibus^* which is recognized as the highest reason in rank for a country to void a treaty, and it means that:

“the situation has changed!”

Rebus Sic Stantibus means that “there was more to the treaty than what met the eye”…..more than the states and the citizens were aware of at the time of its ratification! This is the case with the United Nations Charter which was enacted as a “treaty”! Unfairly and unjustly sold as a “program for peace,” the U.N. Charter was actually engineered to overthrow the American system of government and restructure the United States as a part of a global government. The series of purported treaties that followed are being passed as “laws” and are not at all what the general public has been led to believe that they are supposed to contain.

“An unconstitutional act is not law....as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” -- Norton vs. Shelby County, 118 US 425 p. 442

Another route the states may choose to force the repeal of a treaty is by using the decision of the Supreme Court. Keep in mind that it takes only one state to force the Supreme Court to rule on an issue. If the ruling comes out unfavorable, the recourse for the state(s) is to override the Supreme Court and undertake a repeal action themselves. Such an action takes thirty-eight (38) states to successfully override the Supreme Court. Repealing “enabling legislation” alone (negating previous national action) does not complete the necessary procedure to rescind a treaty! Additionally, a repeal, rescinding, and revoking action should be effected against an aberrant

Rebus Sic Stantibus is the premier principle of international law and is held as the highest reason in rank for voiding a treaty!

previously passed treaty in order to negate previous international action. It is a well known fact that one of the checks in the Check and Balance System places the responsibility upon the states to keep the federal government from exceeding the limits of power they delegated to it. Chances are that your state governor or representatives are not versed in international law and do not realize that Rebus Sic Stantibus is a recognized principle of international law which exists between nations and that it allows for the revocation of disastrous treaties that destroy the structure, sovereignty, and liberty of a nation,

The facts regarding the objectives of the United Nations were not known by the general population at the time the U.N. Charter was enacted. Transferring U.S. armed forces to permanent control of communist commanders, allowing the avowed enemies of our country to supervise the closing of our defense plants and military bases, and to prohibit law-abiding Americans from owning firearms is in violation of the United States Constitution! These U.N. objectives do not meet the criteria to qualify the U.N. Charter as a treaty! Also, little known is the fact that a treaty is enforceable upon every individual!

The people have been lied to about the “peace” program and the “safer world”! They were not told of the inverse purposes of the United Nations! Now the truth is being laid bare before the peop1e! The situation has changed! The U. N. was plastered onto the U. S. by using laudable goals as a way of bringing in the U.N.’s hidden objectives! Plenty of grounds exist for putting pressure on representatives to void the U.N. Charter and related world government treaties.

A Word of Warning Regarding the Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus. There is a possibility, because of the deviousness of the courts, that the courts may insist that Rebus Sic Stantibus is a nullification procedure, the type of which they threw out when the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions were defensively tried in more recent times. The courts need to understand that it is not the courts who have the “final say” on protection of the nation’s sovereignty! In a united action the states have superiority over all three branches of the federal system!

* Source: Blacks Law Dictionary -- At this point of affairs; in these circumstances. A name given to a tacit condition, said to attach to all treaties, that they shall cease to be obligatory so soon as the state of facts and conditions upon which they were founded has substantially changed.