ANOTHER
RESPONSE TO N.S.
September
11, 2005
Dear
N.S.
You
asked me ‘if allowing the Mexican
military in is a Trojan Horse’.
Then you added: Chinese military
observed in Louisiana, too. Your
opinion is as good as mine at this point!
I can only tell you
(a)
what I feel positive about;
(b)
what we have a right to logically assume;
(c)
what my apprehensions are; and
(d)
as best as I can determine to be facts, and reasonable predictions.
I
feel positive that the techniques being applied are derived from “The
Politics of Change in Local Government Reform”.* That study wasn’t done to waste dollars! It was a serious government funded advisory
task force report, a resort for those to use who wanted to force
(global) government, because things weren’t percolating the way they wanted to
meet their world global goals, ‘changes’ and time frames. I get that positive
feeling about use of P.O.C. because the Gulf tragedy fits all the
suggestions for global conversion proposed in the California State financed
P.O.C. study: Collapse, Crisis, Catastrophe, Corruption are all specified in
it, but did this planning fall short?
I
think we have a right to assume that the Gulf tragedy is the
result of deliberate evil engineering because of
(a) government’s
past history of deceptive performances;
(b) stated
global world government goals and objectives; and
(c) being in Stage
III of the global government planning, pro- gramming,
infrastructure engineering and erection.**
I
have the uneasy feeling that more of the same is coming in a larger
proportion to add to what’s already been done to terrorize people.
I
am apprehensive (but could be wrong) that the HAARP technology is
being put to use -- that its results are not yet fully understood even by its
purveyors. If suspicions are correct,
and if it had been used, I believe that it was expected to have had a more
devastating effect upon the Gulf Coast area than what actually did happen.
For example: The original predictions of the height of hurricane waves, which did not come up to the actual fact, but only to half of the prediction; the exaggeration of ‘tens of thousands’ of deaths was predicted and was also wrong; and the 25,000 supply of body bags, etc was another over estimation.
Assuming that the hurricane was (and may have been) engineered to
be greater than its normal natural potential, some of the delay in the rescue
response added to the losses they intended in the preliminary
prediction. The delay by the unwary
may have been caused by the shock and stunning consequences of what they
did see.
For
others, those who could have been ‘in’ on the planning, the resultant
confusion could have added to the delay due to lack of what they
had expected to have had occur. The extent which did not
happen could have contributed to indecision and mis-management from the
standpoint of disappointment in an engineered horror. In other words, the response from the public
to help - except for money - got in their way. I have a feeling that they were looking for an even greater
disaster than what did happen. Is
it possible that confusion added to the delay because it turned out to be a
disappointment to the planning engineers because it was not as big a disaster
as they had expected the damage to be? Nevertheless, they did overestimate it.
Why
were so many offers of domestic help turned down? Many were told not to come -- that they “had no permission
from Homeland Security to come” is what they were told. For example, the Sheriff of Shelby County in
Tennessee had 30 men ready to leave, and take down a load of food, but they
were told “to stand down”, that they had “no permission from Homeland Security
to come”. (Incidentally, the Tennessee
police department went ahead and sent food and police uniforms for the
Louisiana police officers to wear. They
even had special T-shirts made for the Louisiana officers to wear to identify
themselves since those officers had lost their own police clothing in the
storm.) Why was so much domestic help
turned away? See attached paper
for a lot of help refused.
Why were these offers not rapidly grabbed up and utilized?
Why
were American National Guard troops pulled away from their present duty of border
protection? Chris Simcox of the
Minutemen has reported this to be the case. Why increase dangers from open
borders? Why turn away so much loyal domestic aid? Why allow the military of
two nations (who harbor oppressive ambitions) to set foot on our soil? Surely, the Pentagon (who went to such
effort in the Base Realignment and Closure, supposedly
to cut military expenditures, and supposedly
streamline our defenses) should have enough smarts to tell the difference in
usage of loyal forces versus use of enemy forces! Where was their advice?
Why
pull from the endangered borders and increase the possibility of attack and
added terrorist entries from there? The
borders are already undermanned! Much of the stuff we need now for Louisiana is
in Iraq. These are all facts. How great is our strength if we have dissipated
our strength and reserves? Can we rely
on this kind of crisis management?
We have become more vulnerable to attack under this global minded
administration! Will the Constitution survive?
Is this sheer madness or scene-setting for ‘more to come’?
Since
we signed into the United Nations, this country has deteriorated in
every way under subsequent so-called “presidents”. FACT: We really don’t
have “presidents” any more! The White
House desk has been transformed over into
the administrator of global government.***
Watch
for coming events: The chip will be demanded for the nation,
because babies and little children (who could not tell who they were) were
separated from their mothers. Medical
histories and prescription records were lost to help the ill and infirmed,
etc. The forcible gun removal from all
citizens is another omen. Wasn’t
weather modification a study done way back scores of years ago? Doesn’t HAARP
have a potential to increase storms in weather modification? Haven’t we been told by government that we
could expect more disasters to befall us?
Will
those innocent and law-abiding people in Louisiana, whose guns were forcibly
taken away, see a return of their weapons when the crisis ends? Has martial law really been declared
to permit such setting aside of Constitutional law -- or -- are we allowing
this on presumption
only? Isn’t gun ownership a part of
common law -- an absolute right -- endowed from the Creator -- which is
beyond any martial law to apply to decent folks? Shouldn’t an army of qualified able bodied armed Louisiana
citizens been recruited and deputized to help their local police? Hasn’t
F.E.M.A. been around long enough to be better prepared? Wasn’t the hurricane expected? Is it a coincidence that the
Commander-in-chief took his vacation while the hurricane hit? Two days after it hit, Geo. Bush was out
stomping the trail making speeches to support his social security transformation plan. Was that transformation more urgent to Geo. Bush?
The
question is: Is the entry of these foreign troops from Mexico and China a
Trojan Horse? Whether it was
deliberately planned or not, consideration of the evidence here indicates the
situation to be more favorable to Trojan Horse possibilities.
|
|
* Formal title for the California Report that
has been often called by its quick name: the “Houlihan Report”.
** Openly expressed desire for a ‘new world
order’; the constant cry and force for ‘change’; supported by freedom-eroding laws
passed by the U.S. Congress; plus
documented transformational revisions
made in the operation of the whole American system of government by
presidential agreements, executive orders, treaties, etc.
***
Warburg, James P. (February 17, 1950) - International
Banker - Testifying at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee - "We shall
have World Government whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by
conquest or consent."
